This Is Not a Christian Nation -The Declaration of Indpendence
Posted: Thursday, January 21, 2010
by Dr. Brice E. Vickery
Supernutrient Corporation
“We Are Not A Christian Nation"
President Barak Hussein Obama – Speech in Turkey
Never in the history of our country has any president had the ignorance or the arrogance to make this statement about the great people of these United States. He seems to have changed his book title from “The Audacity of Hope" to “The Arrogance of Ignorance!"This is intended to be the first of a series that proves the Christian origins of our great country and why we have been blessed by Almighty God. When the president compared our values to these murdering Turks he was "acting stupidly!"
The early beginning (The beginning may have been The Mayflower compact) starts with the Declaration of Independence presented here in its entirety so that those who wish may refresh their memories. For those who don't want to read the entire document there are four highlighted lines (in bold larger type) that refer to our God. The reason that the far left wants to discredit God is because the "glorious light of the gospel" shines light on the evils that men are constantly doing. That comparison THEY CANNOT STAND. That is why they shoved the Ten Commandments from the lobby and into a closet. They will make nice sizzling sounds in the hereafter- and for eternity.
Please take note – the Lord is mentioned FOUR times here.
The Declaration of Independence
Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident:
That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and, when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them, and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing, with manly firmness, his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining, in the mean time, exposed to all the dangers of invasions from without and convulsions within.
He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.
He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.
He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the military independent of, and superior to, the civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:
For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing taxes on us without our consent:
For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:
For transporting us beyond seas, to be tried for pretended offenses:
For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these colonies:
For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:
For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow-citizens, taken captive on the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.
He has excited domestic insurrection among us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.
In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have we been wanting in our attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them, from time to time, of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity; and we have conjured them, by the ties of our common kindred, to disavow these usurpations which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too, have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity which denounces our separation, and hold them as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.
We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name and by the authority of the good people of these colonies solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that, as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.
[Signed by] JOHN HANCOCK [President]
So as our “unbelievable" president tries discredit and disown Christianity we give him back his own pronouncement! “That’s just stupidity!"
This Article has been viewed 403 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (2 total)The US is not a nation founded on Christianity, it is a secular nation with a Christian majority. This was accepted and non-contraversial back in the days of the Founding Fathers (some were Christians, some not).The Treaty of Tripoli includes the statement:"the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion"and this was not contraversial at the time.Most of the Declaration was written by Thomas Jefferson, who held deist beliefs, not theistic ones.Obama is a professing Christian, and has not disowned Christianity.Obama would go out and get votes as a "tree worshipper" if there are enough of them. He can't even quote the Bible accurately or- appropriately! He went to a "Hate filled, Black Liberation Church" until it could cost him an election! Then he threw his 20 year pastor "Under the Bus". Neat character history on this guy!Obama would go out and get votes as a "tree worshipper" if there are enough of them. He can't even quote the Bible accurately or- appropriately! He went to a "Hate filled, Black Liberation Church" until it could cost him an election! Then he threw his 20 year pastor "Under the Bus". Neat character history on this guy!
The United States is not a Christian nation. That is bogus misinformation spread mostly by the 20th Century evangelical movement. Obama was right to say we are not a Christian nation. We are a nation where we are free to worship according to our conscience. Anything less than absolute than religious freedom is un-American.Very true. Americans have the *explicit right* to breach the first 2 of the 10 commandments (because these commandments violate the principle of Freedom of Religion). It isn't Christianity that defines the US nation, but the freedoms it gives its people.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.